Archive | Research RSS feed for this section

2012 CrossFit Open: What To Expect

22 Feb

2011′s Amazing Programming Went Unnoticed

In my opinion The CrossFit Open is the most difficult CrossFit Competition to program for. Unlike the Regionals and Games, there isn’t an understood expectation of talent. For example, athletes at the Regional level can handle a high load/reps of olympic and gymnastics movements. Games athletes are expected to handle, well, everything and anything. I was really impressed by the 2011 CrossFit Open. In fact, I think many people overlooked how well the workouts were designed.

Scaling

In 2011 all the workouts had time limits that ranged from 5 to 20 minutes. Also, all of the workouts were easy enough for most people to get some type of score, but hard enough for stronger athletes to separate themselves. Thus, I doubt the workouts will be super heavy. However, they will be heavy enough where scoring high will require a solid amount of strength and endurance. This is one of those it sounds easy but is actually really hard to do workouts. Below is a graph of the results from CrossFit Open 11.1. The distribution of results show how most people were able to do a few rounds, but only a few people were able to really well.

Regional Worthy Threshold

This was the most impressive part of the 2011 Open programming. Although making workouts that everyone can attempt is a big priority, the main priority is setting a threshold for Regional worthy athletes. It turns out, HQ thought of a genius solution. The most technical movements over the 6 weeks were Muscle Ups and Overhead Squats. They were put towards the end of a workout, where the people who were fit enough to get to them were probably able to perform them. For example, The Week 4 workout was a 10 minute AMRAP of 60 Bar-facing burpees, 120 pound Overhead squat, 30 reps and 10 Muscle-ups. The burpees took a good chunk of time for most people, however the more fit athletes were able to move through them quick and attempt the overhead squats and muscle-ups. The Regional worthy athletes put up anywhere between a 1 to 1.5 rounds. However, as long as you could do one bar facing burpee you had a valid score for the workout. In short, genius.

Equipment, Video and Judging

Around 50,000 people will be participating in the open which means we aren’t seeing any high-end(comparatively) equipment during the open. Also, all of the workouts have to be easily recorded and can’t be too difficult to judge.

What I Doubt We Will See

  • Row
  • GHD-Sit Ups
  • Back Extension
  • Rope Climb
  • Swimming
  • Run(unless it’s a shuttle run which I’d like to see)
  • Basically anything you can’t do out of your garage.
  • Push-Ups(mainly because I think everyone can’t help but cheat when they get tired and it’s really hard to judge)
  • Air Squat(hard to judge)
  • Ring Dips

Good Probability

  • Pull-ups
  • Ground To Overhead
  • Dead-lifts
  • Double Unders
  • Bar Facing Burpees(not normal ones and I pray not burpee box-jumps)
  • Wall Balls
  • Toes To Bar
  • Power Cleans
  • Box Jumps
  • Thrusters
  • Squat Clean

Regional Threshold Movements

  • Muscle Ups
  • Overhead Squat
  • Handstand Push-ups

My Random, Gut Is Saying, List

I have no real reason other than thinking it would be cool to see these

  • Shuttle Runs
  • Lunges(Alternating Lunges)
  • KettleBell
  • Fight to The Death With Random Stranger


Feel free to hit me up on Twitter or Facebook.

The Story of Lynne: A CrossFit Girl Workout

9 Dec

While researching CrossFit workouts Corey ran across an interesting turn of events. Jon and I, being the CrossFit junkies we are, went way too far into the matrix.

May 12th, 2004

5 rounds of:
Bench press 135 pounds, max reps
Pull-up, max reps
Rest 2 minutes

Post reps for each round to comments.

Posted on/for Lynne Pitts’ (old school CrossFitter) birthday.

August 5th, 2004

How many reps in 20 minutes of:
Bench press body weight
Pull-ups

Post reps to comments.

This workout was very similar to a previous workout. Lynne killed it, even claiming, “At last, the WOD-God has smiled on me…”

The New Girls(November 2004)

Linda is listed as the “L” Girl workout in the “New Girls” journal article. Note, at this point, Lynne (the workout not the person), doesn’t officially exist.

Lynne (April 8th, 2005)

“Lynne”

Five rounds for max reps of:
Body weight bench press
Pull-ups

Post reps for both exercises in all rounds.

A hybrid of the previous workouts is now called “Lynne”. Long time CrossFitter and affiliate owner, Ahmik Jones, refers a previous WOD (most likely 08/04) as “Lynne”, although this is the first mention of it on Main Site.

Helen over Cindy?

4 Aug

Helen, with 16,486 posts, has recently passed Cindy, 15,707 posts, to become the second most performed CrossFit workout. Let’s figure out why.

If you’ve been with us for a while now, you might’ve browsed our workout collection a few times and noticed a strict hierarchy of workouts based on popularity. Fran has led the way from the very beginning, and rightfully so. It’s certainly the most iconic CrossFit workout and, often times, is used as an introduction to the ever-growing strength and conditioning program. The rest of the top ten consists of the usual suspects: Filthy Fifty, Fight Gone Bad, The CrossFit Total, Angie. Since BTW’s inception, Cindy has held the distinction of the second most popular workout (which is pretty huge considering it is unlikely Fran will ever be dethroned), that is, until Helen recently surpassed it.

What Makes Them Different

Helen, for most people, is a full on sprint(or attempt at one), while cindy is a hard grind for 20 minutes. In fact, Cindy is deceivingly tough, because most people can’t go hard for 20 minutes with proper form.

Personal Standpoint

I find it a tad shocking.  If I had the choice between doing Cindy or Helen, I’d choose Cindy at least 7 times out of 10.  My reasoning?  It’s simple, period. It can be completed within a 5 ft radius, you can do all of it indoors, and, perhaps most important of all, it doesn’t have an ounce of running.  I’m not the biggest fan of running, and I know for a fact that is a sentiment I share with many people.  So what does it all mean?

CrossFIt HQ (Main Site)

Is it possible CrossFit HQ feels the same way?  When looking at the frequency in which the two WODS have been assigned over the past couple of years, it wouldn’t appear so.  Since January 2008, Helen has showed up on the main site 9 times, while Cindy has made a whopping 14 appearances.  Therefore we can’t attribute the higher number of Helen posts to HQ.  This is 100% a result of the community.

CrossFit Attitude?

Perhaps it’s an indicator of CrossFitters’ willingness to work on their weaknesses (ie. running). Makes sense.  It aligns perfectly with the CrossFit mentality.  As people become more and more aware of the CrossFit way, Helen has been thrown into the mix more and more.  Maybe it’s a result of popular coverage.  We’ve all seen the famed OPT Sub 7 Min Helen video.  That’s not to say Cindy doesn’t have a lot of videos out there.  Quite the contrary actually.  But how many 30 round Cindy’s have you seen?  Probably a lot.  Sub 7 Helens are few and far between, which gives it that little something special.  Also, so many Cindy videos seem filled with shoddy push-up and air squat standards that the workout seems to have lost its luster over the years.

Bottom line, it’s great to see the community evolving along with the site.  We realize the existence of popular CrossFit workouts, but lets not forget one of the most important CrossFit elements…constant variation!

Feel free to hit me up on twitter @jake_mannion. Ask us questions about anything via twitter(@btwb) and our Facebook Fan Page.

 

CrossFit Open Workout 1 – 100 Results Analysis

16 Mar

We just passed the 100 results mark for the first CrossFit Open workout, and thought we would share some quick analysis. The bulk of results, around 26%, are between 4-4.9 rounds. Bobby Noyce, a solid beyond the whiteboard user and athlete at CrossFit 515, has the the top result with 8.5333 rounds (all the double unders and one power snatch in the last round). Bobby averaged a little over a minute for each round. I anticipate the top scores being very close, where a few reps will separate many ranks. In short, it’s going to be a fun week!

Remember to register and post your results on the CrossFit Games site. You can also register as a fan to view, judge and comment on results.

The 10 Most Popular CrossFit Workouts

2 Nov

On beyond the whiteboard, we currently have 95,167 different workouts in our database.  The vast majority of these are random workouts created on a whim by an individual athlete.  But in the CrossFit world, certain workouts (most of them named) are done over and over again.  Here are  the 10 most popular CrossFit workouts.

  1. Fran
  2. Cindy
  3. Helen
  4. 5k Run
  5. CrossFit Total
  6. Fight Gone Bad
  7. Annie
  8. Angie
  9. Filthy Fifty
  10. Grace

Physics, Crossfit, and Beyond the Whiteboard

20 Jul

We’ve noticed a few posts on our user feedback regarding work done and thought it would be a good idea to post a bit about how we calculate work and power, and what these figures mean for the layman.

What do you mean by work and power?

In physics, mechanical work is defined as the product of the force acting on an object and the distance it moved. For example, if you do a shoulder press, the work done is the weight of the barbell multiplied by the distance from the barbell’s resting position above your shoulders to its position above your head — roughly the length of your arms. So, if you did a 150-pound shoulder press, and your arms are about 2 feet long, you can find the work done in foot-pounds by just multiplying the weight by the length of your arms; in this case one rep of the shoulder press is 2 ft * 150 lb = 300 foot-pounds of work done. If you did that 50 times, you would have done 15,000 foot-pounds of work.

If you prefer metric units, as most people outside of the US generally do: if your arms are about 0.6 meters long, and you pressed 70 kg (which weighs 9.8 m/s² * 70 kg = 686 newtons on Earth), the work done for one rep is 686 newtons * 0.6 meters = 411.6 joules (or newton-meters).

Power is defined as the rate at which work is performed. This is just work done divided by the time you took to do it; we find your average power output by simply dividing your work done by the number of seconds you took to do the work, assuming we know how long you took. In a max effort lifting workout, we can’t tell you your power output since you’re not posting your total time. For example, if you did a workout which was just 50 of the above shoulder presses, no other exercises, and took 30 minutes to do so, your power output would be 15,000 foot-pounds / 1,800 seconds = 8.3 foot-pounds per second. (You can do the same thing for metric, only you end up with joules per second, also known as watts)

So, how do you find work and power for a Crossfit workout?

This is our “11 herbs and spices”. Secret ingredients. Ok, so the real 11 herbs and spices are probably salt, pepper, flour, MSG, and 7 kinds of grease, but ours are a lot more complicated. For each and every exercise for which we have sufficient information to do so, we have a work formula which tells us how much work a person did in one rep of that exercise. In some cases, we can get this information from a weigh in, so make sure to weigh in regularly! In other cases, this means we need more information than a simple weigh in, so be sure to set your work formula measurements at least once! If we don’t have your measurements we can fudge it a little, basing your deadlift height, squat height, etc. on some averages based on your total height from your last weigh in, but it will be much more accurate with real measurements. Once we have your information we can plug it in to each formula and calculate the work done over an entire workout.

Why is any of this important to a Crossfitter?

Many Crossfit workouts are relatively short, high-intensity workouts that even I can finish in under about 20 minutes, assuming you are scaling it properly. Your objective in any workout, if you’ve done that particular one before, is to beat your old time, which, assuming you’re lifting the same weight and your own weight hasn’t changed, means you’ll be doing the same amount of work but with a higher power output. However, not everyone can do every workout as Rx’d. I, for example, started Crossfit in September of last year, and weighed in at 265 pounds at 5’5″. I was in horrible shape; I nearly passed out halfway through Helen on my first day. Since then I’ve lost about 30 pounds overall, gained some lean mass, and generally have a lot more energy. If I was just looking at my times/rounds/reps I might see points where I took a lot longer to complete a workout, or did fewer reps or rounds, but since I lifted heavier weights, used a lighter band on pullups, and so forth, my work done and/or power output is much higher than my previous attempt. What is important in a case like mine is to look at your power output and make sure it’s heading upwards every time. And once again, make sure you weigh in often if you’re trying to lose or gain weight so that those power calculations are accurate.

Hey, your site says I didn’t do any work this entire workout! Tell that to my aching arms/legs/back!

There are still a good number of exercises that we don’t have formulæ for (mostly custom exercises added by gym owners which we don’t know anything about), and some exercises where you actually don’t do any work, such as running. That’s right; when you run, although you expend energy, produce a force, and move through a distance, you don’t do any mechanical work!

Huh?

This part’s going to get a little heavy, so bear with me. Work is also defined as “energy transferred by a force acting through a distance” (Thanks to wikipedia for this and a lot of the equations below, it’s been about 8 years since physics 2A). This means that unless the energy in a body changes, including kinetic energy and potential energy, no work is performed. For example, I’m writing this on a laptop weighing 5.5 pounds, which is sitting on a table. Since the laptop isn’t crashing to the ground, the table is exerting a force of 5.5 pounds upward on the laptop. However, since it’s not moving, there is no change in its potential or kinetic energy, and no work is being done. This is also why you do no work when performing an L-sit or static hang.

I think we’re going to have to dive a little deeper here and define kinetic energy and potential energy to really understand what is (or in this case, isn’t) happening.

Kinetic energy is the energy a body possesses due to its motion. In other words, an object has kinetic energy if it is moving relative to the observer. In general you can find this with the formula E = ½ * m * v², where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity relative to the observer. In other words the faster something is moving relative to you, the more energy it has.

Potential energy is energy stored by a body. In the case of a weight that has been lifted from the ground, the weight has potential energy because if you let go of it, gravity will take over and cause the weight to move, towards your foot, and unless you move out of the way all of that newly acquired kinetic energy on the weight will transfer itself right into your toes. A simple equation for potential energy due to gravity, adequate for our purpose, is E = m * g * h, where m is the mass of the object, g is standard gravity (9.8 m/s² on Earth) and h is the height above the ground at which the object is at rest.

Knowing these two facts, can you see why running does no work? There is no change in potential energy unless you are running uphill, and we assume you are running on a fairly level surface such as a track, or a flat sidewalk. There is also no change in kinetic energy. You are both the observer and the body in question; your kinetic energy (motion) relative to yourself is always zero.

This doesn’t mean you should stop running! Despite the fact that no measurable net work is being done, you are still burning calories, strengthening your legs and your cardiovascular system, and boosting your metabolism.

Regarding exercises where work is done, but we still say zero: If you want your custom exercises given a proper work formula, give us a full, proper description of the movement (maybe a video as well, gym admins will be able to tag videos to exercises in the near future) and when we get the chance, we can come up with a formula and add it to the site. This will affect workout sessions posted in the past as well as the future, so go ahead and use any exercises you want in your workouts; when we know how to calculate the work done, your older sessions will show every ft-lb of work you did.

If you want to find out more about physics and Crossfit listen or read anything Coach Glassman has authored, and browse through the other great Crossfit Journal Articles. It’s where we started and continue to go for inspiration. Below are some CFJ articles to get you going.

Assisted Pull-ups: The Mystery Unraveled

20 Jun

Up until this point, no one ever really knew how much assistance the various bands provided when used during a pull-up. This made calculating work performed and avg. power output for band-assisted pull-ups impossible.

By the way, which is harder: using blue and purple (or plain) bands together, or just using the green alone? And just how much harder is the blue band than the green band? What about blue and red? We get these questions all the time at our gym.

During the process of incorporating power calculations into beyond the whiteboard, we decided to measure and quantify the assistance provided by the various colored bands. We now know very accurately how much work is being performed by the athlete during assisted pull-ups. These numbers depend on the weight of the athlete, the distance they travel during a pull-up, and the band(s) they are using for the pull-up. This was a huge step toward our goal of enabling comparison between Rx’d and scaled workouts based on work/power output.

Based on our findings, we have created a PDF that shows the relative assistance of the various bands and band combinations, and have made it available as a free download. We hope that CrossFit Affiliates and individual CrossFitters alike will find it a useful addition to their gyms. Feel free to print it out and post it near your pull-up bars, that’s what we did!

Pull-up Band Assistance Chart

bandassist

Color Version PDF
Black and White Version PDF
*Updated on Jun 24th to include more combinations

Jonathan Kinnick and Corey Tripp